The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gaming.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial websites using both complimentary casino-style games and lucrative rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to point out claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as conventional casinos, just without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the business faces accusations of unlawful gambling in a New York suit that claims VGW uses star endorsers to 'develop a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm uncertain" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a range of stars from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any differences in between traditional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of many sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has a handle social sweeps casino, Stake, that he frequently promotes on social media

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads typically center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the capacity for real sports betting losses.

Others lure consumers with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad displaying Drake's automobiles, planes and mansions before pivoting to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never provided up.'

The inconsistency in between gambling websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, most of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting totally free.

'Most social sweeps customers never buy,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social casinos provide clients a possibility to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the alternative to purchase worthless currency often described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real money, but can be utilized to unlock different functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, allowing customers to get other currency understood as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake's cars, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but seven states, which has actually helped to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require normally need recognition. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit customers to submit mail-in requests for free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully particular directions. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, thus providing a reason to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment video games for a possibility to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a way of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a type of online entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to pay for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an essential distinction between social sweeps and conventional online gaming sites like casinos.'

Think about the way that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that provide them the opportunity to win lucrative rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself does not meet the definition of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all type of everyday businesses in the United States, everything from hamburgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thereby suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're normally not tied to casino-style video games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the attributes commonly associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payouts, generally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the common payment percentage for a short-term advertising sweepstakes is a minor share of the revenue earned by the company [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the web cafes that sprang up in Florida, offering clients the opportunity to play casino-style video games for genuine rewards. Many of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually given that been shuttered over claims of unlawful gaming.

DJ Khaled is among numerous celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos ought to deal with similar scrutiny.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually repeatedly been cited by courts and state attorney generals as crucial aspects in identifying that a sweepstakes promo remained in truth a guise for illegal gambling.'

Among the gambling establishment market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being deprived of protections and states are giving up considerable tax and revenue chances as this sports betting replaces that performed through managed channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have actually sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current suit, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'unlawful gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have likewise been named as accuseds in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.

'We usually do not talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com via email. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play video games across many of North America, as we have for more than a decade, producing not only excellent video games, user experiences and entertainment, but also ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly common throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we mean to vigorously protect any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns between traditional online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments might prove bothersome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong stance against prohibited sports betting - particularly when attempting to tamp down the occasional gambling scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting apparently unlawful sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise ignored to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to consumers the distinctions and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our company practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser said. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state attorneys basic rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton