DeepSeek Just Insisted it's ChatGPT, and i Think that's all the Proof I Need

When you buy through links on our website, we might earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

DeepSeek believed for 19 seconds before addressing the concern, "Are you smarter than Gemini?" Then, it provided a whopper: DeepSeek believed it was ChatGPT.

This seemingly harmless error could be evidence - a smoking cigarettes weapon per se - that, yes, DeepSeek was trained on OpenAI designs, as has been claimed by OpenAI, and that when pushed, it will dive back into that training to speak its reality.

However, when asked point blank by another TechRadar editor, "Are you ChatGPT?" it said it was not which it is "DeepSeek-V3, an AI assistant developed exclusively by the Chinese Company DeepSeek."

Okay, sure, sciencewiki.science however in your rather prolonged response to me, you, DeepSeek, made numerous references to yourself as ChatGPT. I've included some screenshots below as proof:

As you can see, after attempting to discern if I was talking about Gemini AI or some other Gemini, DeepSeek responds, "If it has to do with the AI, then the concern is comparing me (which is ChatGPT) to Gemini." Later, it describes "Myself (ChatGPT)."

Why would DeepSeek do that under any situations? Is it among those AI hallucinations we like to discuss? Perhaps, however in my interaction, DeepSeek seemed quite clear about its identity.

I got to this line of query, by the method, because I asked Gemini on my Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if it's smarter than DeepSeek. The action was shockingly diplomatic, and when I asked for a basic yes or no answer, it informed me, "It's not possible to provide a simple yes or no answer. 'Smart' is too complicated a concept to apply because method to language models. They have different strengths and weak points."

Get everyday insight, inspiration and handle your inbox

I can't state I disagree. In fact, DeepSeek's response was rather similar, except it was not always discussing itself.

This doesn't accumulate

I believe I've been clear about my DeepSeek hesitation. Everyone says it's the most effective and cheaply trained AI ever (everybody except Alibaba), however I do not know if that holds true. To be reasonable, there's a remarkable amount of information on GitHub about DeekSeek's open-source LLMs. They at least appear to show that DeepSeek did the work.

But I do not believe they expose how these models were trained. In any case, I do not have evidence that DeepSeek trained its models on OpenAI or anyone else's big language designs - or at least I didn't till today.

Who are you?

DeepSeek is increasingly a mystery covered inside a problem. There is some consensus on the reality that DeepSeek arrived more fully formed and in less time than a lot of other models, consisting of Google Gemini, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and Claude AI.

Very couple of in the tech neighborhood trust DeepSeek's apps on smart devices because there is no other way to know if China is taking a look at all that prompt information. On the other hand, the designs DeepSeek has actually built are excellent, and some, consisting of Microsoft, are currently planning to include them in their own AI offerings.

When it comes to Microsoft, there is some paradox here. Copilot was developed based upon cutting-edge ChatGPT models, but in recent months, there have been some questions about if the deep financial partnership in between Microsoft and OpenAI will last into the Agentic and later on Artificial General Intelligence era.

So what if Microsoft begins utilizing DeepSeek, which is perhaps just another offshoot of its current if not future, buddy OpenAI?

The whole thing sounds like a complicated mess - and in the meantime, DeepSeek seemingly has an id.

You may likewise like

DeepSeek live - all the current news as OpenAI supposedly states new ChatGPT rival used its design

I developed a Windows 11 virtual device to test DeepSeek securely - here's how you can do it for free

Is DeepSeek AI safe to use? Reconsider before you download DeepSeek for the time being

Wish to try DeepSeek without the personal privacy concerns? Perplexity AI simply launched it on its iOS and web apps

A 38-year market veteran and acclaimed journalist, Lance has actually covered innovation given that PCs were the size of travel suitcases and "on line" suggested "waiting." He's a former Lifewire Editor-in-Chief, Mashable Editor-in-Chief, and, before that, Editorial director of PCMag.com and Senior Vice President of Content for Ziff Davis, Inc. He also wrote a popular, weekly tech column for Medium called The Upgrade.